Peer-revision session

1.) Was the paper review activity helpful? Why or why not?
2.) What did you like/hate the most about it?
3.) What was the most useful feedback you got?
4.) What will you change after the peer-revision session?

1.) Yes. The paper review activity was very helpful because my group members helped me to better understand an analysis. They were able to answer all of my questions that I had and lead me in a good direction.

2.) What I liked most about the review activity was that I recieved a lot of helpful advice from my group members. The part that I hated most about it was that I do not recall being told that we had to give our members the revisions back on their printed copies so I did not have their revisions for them.

3.) The most useful feedback that I got back was really just a better understanding of an analysis paper. One of my group members really helped me understand what I did that was wrong and what I can do to fix it. My group also gave me a few opinions and good pieces of advice of what to change in my analysis.

4.) After the peer-review session I will probably end up changing my whole paper. I learned in my session that I wrote it wrong and how to write it correctly so I will end up changing the format and organization of my paper.